Feet rating stats (5 total votes)
1
5 stars
5 stars
1
4 stars
4 stars
2
3 stars
3 stars
0
2 stars
2 stars
1
1 star
1 star
| Rating: | (3.18/5) |
| You Rated: | (click to rate) |
| Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts | |
Gallery Settings
more info5 pictures were removed from this gallery.
People who liked Lee Boardman's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
|
2023-06-28 06:02:24 They shouldn’t all be marked “Adult Content”.
For a start, “Rome” is rated 15 so isn’t pornography and, while there may be breasts in two of the images, there is nothing adult about the close-ups of his feet which, if seen out of context, you would not know the actor was simulating sex |
|
2023-06-28 06:30:49 okay but what does the BD stand for? asking for a friend
|
|
2023-06-28 06:32:29 My initials
|
|
2023-06-28 11:07:53 @BristolBDFeet Private parts are AC, regardless of censor, blur or crops.
I'm curious to know who misinformed you by saying that AC was limited to sexual content. |
|
2023-06-28 18:50:10 Idk. I told the guy back in February what AC is on wf, that it isn't just actual porn, and that cropping isn't allowed. One of their uploads was removed for the very same reason. Not the first guy lately to conflate adult content and pornography, though.
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2023-06-29 03:56:17 The scene from Rome starts on his feet, then pans to show them having sex. My point was, yes it is from a “sex scene”, but there was nothing in that shot - cropped or uncropped - that could be considered adult content (barefeet on a bed & two women fanning him).
As I said, I recognise the partial shot of the woman’s naked body in the other shots the person posted *were* “adult content” but, again, I fail to see how the first two shots were as you would only know it was a sex scene if you’d seen the show. Out of context it was just two shots of his feet? |
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2023-06-29 04:00:09 (1) These aren’t my posts
(2) Those photos weren’t cropped. I own Rome on DVD and, yes, while it is at the start of a simulated sex scene, it starts with a shot of his feet and pans around - which is what the OP posted. If it was a video still, I’d understand it being “adult content”, but saying part of a sex scene which doesn’t actually depict any of the sex feels like a bit of a stretch to define as “Adult content” - that was my point. That was very different from the image you and I discussed, which had nudity cropped out of it, and which I understand and haven’t posted any images like that since |
|
2023-06-29 04:11:12 "(1) These aren’t my posts" - Who claimed that they were?
"(2) Those photos weren’t cropped." - The first two pictures had her nipple exposed, then the newer two were the same two pictures, but with the nipple cropped out of frame, so yes, they were cropped AC. |
