Bigfoot

  Go to IMDb page
Shoe Size: 16 US edit
Birthplace: [NOT SET] edit
Birth Date: [NOT SET] edit
Feet rating stats (7 total votes)
4
5 stars
0
4 stars
0
3 stars
0
2 stars
3
1 star

Rating:
 (3.37/5)
You Rated:  
 (click to rate)
Email me on new:   Pictures   Wall Posts  
Gallery Settings
∨ Skip down to wall ∨
more info1 pictures were removed from this gallery.

Got anymore Bigfoot Feet Pictures? Upload Here
∧ Jump back to top ∧
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info

Ye Olde Doc
Member since 08/2019
High Knight (Level 5)Trusted Uploader♛81
Reported: Illegal / Copyrighted
2023-01-15 03:20:01
As usual, many lack any nuance in their ratings, instead having a simple "on" and "off" switch with 3 FIVE star "beautiful" votes and 3 ONE star "ugly" votes, with no ratings in-between!!! That's if you can rate at all prematurely. Perhaps an "okay" rating could be a proper tentative rating without further information and a close-up.
Radosław35
Member since 04/2016
Guild Knight (Level 4)♛125
2023-01-15 03:25:02
I also think 3 stars are spot on here lol!
Taro Mochi
Member since 03/2016
Devoted Guilder (Level 3)♛13
2023-01-15 05:10:32
First of all, I don't know who this is and haven't seen the picture.

But generally speaking:

I have to disagree. It's not necessarily because users "lack any nuance in their ratings" since some people - like me - have decided a long time ago to only give out "nice" and "beautiful" ratings (at least for LIVING celebs) in order to not hurt the person's feelings, and furthermore to not make them avoid showing their own feet.
Hell, it's not 2010 anymore. In other words: wikiFeet isn't our little secret anymore. In this day and age it's a very well known website that gets talked about in the most popular late-night shows and talk shows. Probably every day new people learn about it, and I'm sure a lot of celebs come here to check their own pages more or less regularly. WE SHOULD CONSIDER THIS WHEN RATING, AND NOT BE SO FUCKIN' SELFISH. The main goal of this website very obviously is to get as much (different) high quality pics of every displayed celeb. In this spirit, we should simply refrain from doing anything that stands against this goal. Therefore it's extremely counterproductive to give out bad ratings. It only has the potential to make them unhappy and insecure, and not showing off anymore - to the disadvantage of THEIR fans! This is a thousand times more important than just "nuancing" the ratings, because, again, THAT'S THE MAIN GOAL OF THIS WEBSITE. I personally could perfectly live with everybody here having a rather good rating, no problem. Also, keep in mind we still have the automatic "gorgeous" rating for further differentiation. Nobody is obliged to rate AT ALL, so why not simply move on to the next page if you see someone/something you don't like, instead of anonymously downrating and downcommenting foreign people that (usually) haven't done anything bad to you, and therefore fuckin' it up for everybody else, especially their fans who may like their feet and wish to see them for the future...?

This being said, in my honest opinion it's extremely stupid to give just an "okay" rating because we are "without further information and a close-up". It's not helpful, it surely won't help the celeb to confidently show their feet more if they stumble upon their own page just to find out there's two full stars lacking for their feet to be seen as beautiful. Think about how YOU would feel!
So... Why not take a more positive approach? One can start higher and still lower down if you really feel that's necessary as soon as more evidence is given. Ever heard of the "benefit of the doubt", Doc...?
RandonGuy
Member since 06/2017
High Knight (Level 5)♛110
2023-01-15 12:19:19
@Taro Mochi Sasquatch would be proud.
Ye Olde Doc
Member since 08/2019
High Knight (Level 5)Trusted Uploader♛81
2023-01-15 03:26:12
Aww shucks... I was waiting for the "natural toes" warriors to come sing it's praises!!! ------------------- ("It" since we are yet unsure of the beasts sex. Many weirdly assume it's male but there's no proof of that!)
Radosław35
Member since 04/2016
Guild Knight (Level 4)♛125
2023-01-15 03:09:15
joke, but Of course, the moderators, please remove ,,, this, unnecessarily takes up space
User rated ★(ugly feet)
Manteau Fabs
Member since 02/2020
Experienced Guilder (Level 2)♛7
2023-01-15 02:32:28
is it suppose to be a troll?
Radosław35
Member since 04/2016
Guild Knight (Level 4)♛125
2023-01-15 03:05:16
ha no not a troll big foot or big gorilla! 😉🤣
MLPumpkin
Member since 08/2014
Devoted Guilder (Level 3)♛2
2023-01-15 02:41:24
We have to keep this page, it's an absolute treasure
Radosław35
Member since 04/2016
Guild Knight (Level 4)♛125
2023-01-15 03:03:24
agreed lol
Radosław35
Member since 04/2016
Guild Knight (Level 4)♛125
2023-01-15 02:18:49
what? The Bigfoot!
Carlos B R
Member since 01/2013
Rookie Guilder (Level 1)
2023-01-15 01:57:10
What is this?! Why exist this page here? Admins what happen
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
Sandy123
Member since 12/2022
♛2
2023-01-15 01:55:48
Nah what is this 😭
Connor28
Member since
♛4
2023-01-15 01:52:22
This can't be serious...
Login to wikiFeet


Forgot my password   |   Sign up